SALT LAKE CITY – Dyno Nobel, a global leader in commercial explosives, reported successful results from a trial of its Differential Energy technology taking place at a surface molybdenum mine in the United States. The mine agreed to an initial three month trial. The goal was to improve safety, particularly through NOX reduction, along with improving blast performance with fragmentation, oversize and hard toes. By switching to Differential Energy the mine met every goal they set out to accomplish, which resulted in lowering their overall production costs.
To help address the problems the mine was having, Dyno Nobel employed its Titan 1000ΔΕ technology. Prior to the trial, the mine was loading dry holes with a mixture of 30% emulsion and 70% ANFO and wet holes with 100% gassed emulsion.
The Dyno Nobel Differential Energy system allows blasters to accurately vary the density of chemically gassed emulsion as it is being loaded into the blast hole, enabling the operator to load multiple densities of gassed emulsion into the same hole and match the geology characteristics of the ground.
The mine had the challenge of blasting through a variety of different geologies from very hard rock to softer rock. Due to this, the blast crew loaded very high densities in the hard rock and much lower densities in the softer rock to maximize the efficiency of the blast.
The trial period was extended from three months to six months during which over 109 trial blasts were conducted to adequately measure air quality, mine productivity, fragmentation and digability. The mine was able to meet the goals set forth at the beginning of the trial:
Since the trial (now over a year later), the mine has fully adopted Differential Energy technology, using 100% Titan 1000ΔΕ and no longer uses Anfo. Dyno Nobel’s Differential Energy technology enabled the mine to redistribute the explosive energy in the blast hole, distributing the accurate amount of energy throughout the hole, varying the detonation pressure.
Visit DynoNobel.com to learn more.
2 Comments
Chris Preston
I was just wondering if I was reading correctly. I refer to your text above which states;
“To help address the problems the mine was having, Dyno Nobel employed its Titan 1000?? technology. Prior to the trial, the mine was loading dry holes with a mixture of 30% emulsion and 70% ANFO and wet holes with 100% gassed emulsion”.
Shouldn’t it read that an emulsion blend of 30% emulsion and 70% ANFO would be used in WET holes with 100% gassed emulsion used in dry holes?
Could you clarify whether this is in fact true/false?
Thanks very much for your help.
Chris Preston, P.Eng. MCP
Consulting Engineer
Derek Holmes, P.Chem.
Gassed emulsion is well suited to wet holes and displaces Water as loading is from the bottom of the borehole up. The text appears to be correct.